PVP-I Use Cases

/

July 16, 2025

0.5% Povidone-Iodine: A Safe, Inexpensive Shield Against COVID-19 in ENT Clinics

With the nose and throat being major entry points for SARS-CoV-2, targeted antisepsis is crucial. This study proposes 0.5% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) as a pre-procedure rinse and nasal drop for both patients and healthcare workers.

Blog Image

Why PVP-I?

  • Broad-spectrum antiseptic with proven in vitro action against SARS, MERS, and other coronaviruses
  • More effective than alternatives like chlorhexidine and benzalkonium chloride
  • Already widely used in ophthalmology, orthopedics, and surgical asepsis

SARS-CoV-2 shows high viral loads in the oropharynx and nasopharynx, even in asymptomatic patients. ENT doctors, who often work in close proximity to these areas, are especially at risk.

Study Goals

  1. Propose routine use of 0.5% PVP-I gargles and nasal drops before ENT procedures
  2. Evaluate tolerability in patients and healthcare workers

How the Solution Was Used

Formulation:

  • Dilute 10% PVP-I: 1 mL in 20 mL of sterile water → 0.5% solution

Application Protocol:

  • Nasal drops: 4–5 drops per nostril, 10 minutes before examination
  • Gargle: 10 mL mouth rinse and gargle for 30 seconds each
  • Frequency:
    • For patients: once before procedure
    • For healthcare workers: up to 4 times daily, or every 2–3 hours when in frequent contact

Also used for:

  • Endoscopy
  • Intubation
  • Bronchoscopy
  • ENT exams and minor surgeries

Key Results

  • 315 patients and 17 healthcare workers participated
  • No allergic reactions reported
  • Only 7 patients reported minor discomfort
  • Overall, tolerability was high in both groups

Why This Matters

  • Even a few microliters of contaminated saliva can transmit thousands of viral particles
  • False negatives in COVID-19 testing can give healthcare workers a false sense of security
  • ENT exams are often aerosol-generating, increasing exposure risk

Using 0.5% PVP-I as a mucosal sanitizer could reduce viral load at key entry points, complementing PPE protocols.

Advantages of This Approach

  • Proven safety in nasal and oral applications
  • Low cost and easy to prepare
  • No significant side effects or staining
  • Can be used as both prevention and prophylaxis
  • Scalable for outpatient clinics, hospitals, and frontline workers

Limitations

  • Viral load reduction was not quantified in this study
  • Duration of antiseptic effect (approximately 20 minutes) is theoretical, based on prior SARS/MERS studies
  • More randomized clinical trials needed to confirm real-world effectiveness

Final Thoughts

The study proposes routine use of 0.5% PVP-I nasal drops and gargle for both patients and ENT staff before examinations and procedures. It’s not a replacement for PPE—but a low-risk, high-reward adjunct to reduce transmission via the mouth and nose.

Until universal rapid testing and vaccines are fully deployed, this simple protocol could provide critical added protection—especially in high-exposure specialties like ENT.

Open the full Reseach Pdf

No items found.
Author Image

Suscribe to our newsletter

At risus viverra adipiscing at in tellus integer feugiat nisl pretiua

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Subscribe to our email newsletter for explorers!

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.